🇨🇦 hello Greg thank you for your work and showing that the election was stolen. I’m glad to hear that you are going to court to do something about it. Can the situation which is catastrophic for the world devastating to human beings and terrible for the American people be overturned in light of fraud and something be done and again thank you
I don't think there's any current mechanism to reverse the certification, but if there is fraud he was aware of fraud or helped perpetrate it he could and should be impeached. With clear evidence of tabulator tampering, ballot stuffing, or other crime, it may not be the unattainable feat it would be today. Also, depending on the extent of any knowledge and participation, VP and Speaker could be similarly removed.
I suspect it was at least a partially deliberate strategy to make it taboo, even UnAmerican, to question election results in the future. It's always been like that in some ways, like it's questioning the honor of All Republicans (or All Dems) to mention things that seem off or odd. (Remember See something, Say something?)
As Denierism began to flourish, even as audits turned up nothing, the public became more and more innoculated against the uttering of any suggestion that our elections were anything but free, fair, and transparent... let alone calls for audits. Yet ironically, when election experts made the case that Our elections are the fairest ever, they only made that assessment *because of* the ability to audit the paper.
And it’s off to the shelters I go. Don’t know why I hadn’t thought of that myself. I need to fix the leak in my car so I can carry voters registration forms with me all the time!
I abhor generalizations of any kind, so I bristled at your assertion that "...most white voters simply refuse to acknowledge the devastation caused by Jim Crow tactics." Tell me that you've actually spoken to "most white voters," and I'll believe you. Many of us are aware of the tactics you mentioned, along with efforts to create other barriers to voting in predominantly Black districts, such as reduction in numbers of ballot dropboxes and polling places, and restrictions on Sunday voting, when research has shown that many Black voters prefer to vote on Sunday. I can't remember the details, but I recall reading a few years ago about a situation where there were road closures/detours in a predominantly Black area.
I would argue that we need to establish that the tabulators correctly tally our votes by a full forensic audit comparing the paper ballots to the tabulator results. If they do not, we need to determine why not- incompetence, fraud, malice, or other factors- and FIX them, or Trump will be right about us never needing to vote again.
Greg, Do you know about this grassroots, nonpartisan organization Election Truth Alliance, doing statistical analysis of 2024 election anomalies, initially in 3 Pennsylvania counties where there were more votes than ballots (as I understand their forensic audits). They are counting the paper ballots. Contact them at electiontruthalliance.org.
Why is the corporate media hiding the actual reason Senator Alex Padilla stepped up to ask a question and was immediately beaten down and handcuffed?
Could it be that his “takedown” was a smokescreen for the stick of political dynamite Kristi Noem tossed into the room when she confirmed to all present that the National Guard would remain in Los Angeles until the MAGA Republican goal of regime change and removal of the Mayor of Los Angeles and Governor of California was completed?
Not so fortunate that the entire media has avoided the real story - the Administration and its sycophant henchmen are by design plotting a regime change in California. This is a declaration of war on a State by a Federal Administration. The words of Kristi Noem are the words a chief executive (and Trump did order the same) would level upon a nation state in a declaration of war - that the elected representation is to be replaced by troops sent to effect regime change.
Why is this to difficult to grasp in media and popular knowledge? Noem the Gnome has stated in no uncertain terms that the troops will remain until the governor and Mayor Bass are removed and replaced by the federal government for being “socialists”. As originating from a toady fascist administration, that seems like a declaration of war on California voters.
Trump said he because Padilla was a new senator he didn't recognize him- he didn't look important - because "he looked like an illegal", and Trump only hires like-"minded" people. I suspect Noem wasn't looking for a smokescreen... she wanted to throw more Fear on the fire, and tackling a lib senator who "looked like an illegal" was a happy coincidence.
Just wanted to thank you for your work. I’m Gen X and, while seemingly born Left of center, the 2000 election was a radicalizing event in my political evolution. “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy” is still a book I recommend to people who need to understand just how compromised American elections are. And how complicit the media are in being sure that voters remain ignorant about it.
They're careful to not call their analyses proof. It is however evidence that can be used to "justify" (though why do we need to?) a request to examine the paper ballots in an audit, rather like establishing probably cause for a warrant.
You answered that an audit would do Nada. Why wouldn’t an audit do anything? If not audit, regarding the tampered election, what would do something? Sounds like there’s evidence in New York. If we’re certain that there was 2024 election tampering which it looks like we are, people need some things to shout from the rooftops. We have to go on facts - so if you share us the facts, we will shout them from the rooftops. If the facts to the Democratic political network, they will be shared and shouted. So. we need to work together on this. You are a leader. Start this up - it’s never too late.
I'm not sure... about shouting on rooftops but for sure we need to get a grip on it all before the machines are used again in 26 and 2028!!! Or our proverbial e 🪿is cooked for a very long time
Not “cannot”. They are just afraid of a weak little man and are cowards - not necessarily the reporters, but the people with the money pulling the strings.
I have a hard time imaging an NY precinct where Kamala got 0 votes. Judge says discovery can proceed; I think their next court date is in September, but Lulu says she hopes they (SMART Elections) can give a preliminary report around June 23rd. Not sure but they may get to look at the paper as part of the Discovery.
Many thanks for all you do, Sir!!! I've shared Vigilanties Inc numerous times, and will continue to share with people I help register to vote!
Always - The FACTS of TRUTH with Greg PALAST ^ 🗽✅
🇨🇦 hello Greg thank you for your work and showing that the election was stolen. I’m glad to hear that you are going to court to do something about it. Can the situation which is catastrophic for the world devastating to human beings and terrible for the American people be overturned in light of fraud and something be done and again thank you
I don't think there's any current mechanism to reverse the certification, but if there is fraud he was aware of fraud or helped perpetrate it he could and should be impeached. With clear evidence of tabulator tampering, ballot stuffing, or other crime, it may not be the unattainable feat it would be today. Also, depending on the extent of any knowledge and participation, VP and Speaker could be similarly removed.
One possibility is they're afraid of sounding like trump after the 2020 election.
I suspect it was at least a partially deliberate strategy to make it taboo, even UnAmerican, to question election results in the future. It's always been like that in some ways, like it's questioning the honor of All Republicans (or All Dems) to mention things that seem off or odd. (Remember See something, Say something?)
As Denierism began to flourish, even as audits turned up nothing, the public became more and more innoculated against the uttering of any suggestion that our elections were anything but free, fair, and transparent... let alone calls for audits. Yet ironically, when election experts made the case that Our elections are the fairest ever, they only made that assessment *because of* the ability to audit the paper.
👌🏻👌🏾🙏🏼🙏🏽
And it’s off to the shelters I go. Don’t know why I hadn’t thought of that myself. I need to fix the leak in my car so I can carry voters registration forms with me all the time!
I abhor generalizations of any kind, so I bristled at your assertion that "...most white voters simply refuse to acknowledge the devastation caused by Jim Crow tactics." Tell me that you've actually spoken to "most white voters," and I'll believe you. Many of us are aware of the tactics you mentioned, along with efforts to create other barriers to voting in predominantly Black districts, such as reduction in numbers of ballot dropboxes and polling places, and restrictions on Sunday voting, when research has shown that many Black voters prefer to vote on Sunday. I can't remember the details, but I recall reading a few years ago about a situation where there were road closures/detours in a predominantly Black area.
But why do you think that audits will accomplish nothing? I've been watching ETA's work and it seems scientific and legit.
I would argue that we need to establish that the tabulators correctly tally our votes by a full forensic audit comparing the paper ballots to the tabulator results. If they do not, we need to determine why not- incompetence, fraud, malice, or other factors- and FIX them, or Trump will be right about us never needing to vote again.
Greg, Do you know about this grassroots, nonpartisan organization Election Truth Alliance, doing statistical analysis of 2024 election anomalies, initially in 3 Pennsylvania counties where there were more votes than ballots (as I understand their forensic audits). They are counting the paper ballots. Contact them at electiontruthalliance.org.
Harris and Walz won that election.
Could be
Hi Greg.
Why is the corporate media hiding the actual reason Senator Alex Padilla stepped up to ask a question and was immediately beaten down and handcuffed?
Could it be that his “takedown” was a smokescreen for the stick of political dynamite Kristi Noem tossed into the room when she confirmed to all present that the National Guard would remain in Los Angeles until the MAGA Republican goal of regime change and removal of the Mayor of Los Angeles and Governor of California was completed?
Not so fortunate that the entire media has avoided the real story - the Administration and its sycophant henchmen are by design plotting a regime change in California. This is a declaration of war on a State by a Federal Administration. The words of Kristi Noem are the words a chief executive (and Trump did order the same) would level upon a nation state in a declaration of war - that the elected representation is to be replaced by troops sent to effect regime change.
Why is this to difficult to grasp in media and popular knowledge? Noem the Gnome has stated in no uncertain terms that the troops will remain until the governor and Mayor Bass are removed and replaced by the federal government for being “socialists”. As originating from a toady fascist administration, that seems like a declaration of war on California voters.
Trump said he because Padilla was a new senator he didn't recognize him- he didn't look important - because "he looked like an illegal", and Trump only hires like-"minded" people. I suspect Noem wasn't looking for a smokescreen... she wanted to throw more Fear on the fire, and tackling a lib senator who "looked like an illegal" was a happy coincidence.
(sorry, that sounded flippant when I re-read it, I should have a so-called happy coincidence for her. Or, she may have been jealous of the attention.)
Just wanted to thank you for your work. I’m Gen X and, while seemingly born Left of center, the 2000 election was a radicalizing event in my political evolution. “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy” is still a book I recommend to people who need to understand just how compromised American elections are. And how complicit the media are in being sure that voters remain ignorant about it.
Voter Purges of millions were signed off on by the State Supreme Courts.
Media does not care to raise suspicions they are corrupt hacks, some even appointed by Republican governors
Election Truth Alliance has actual data to support electronic fraud.
They're careful to not call their analyses proof. It is however evidence that can be used to "justify" (though why do we need to?) a request to examine the paper ballots in an audit, rather like establishing probably cause for a warrant.
So does Greg Palast
You answered that an audit would do Nada. Why wouldn’t an audit do anything? If not audit, regarding the tampered election, what would do something? Sounds like there’s evidence in New York. If we’re certain that there was 2024 election tampering which it looks like we are, people need some things to shout from the rooftops. We have to go on facts - so if you share us the facts, we will shout them from the rooftops. If the facts to the Democratic political network, they will be shared and shouted. So. we need to work together on this. You are a leader. Start this up - it’s never too late.
Yes Greg , please repost the post where you lay out all the facts of the 2024 election!
I'm not sure... about shouting on rooftops but for sure we need to get a grip on it all before the machines are used again in 26 and 2028!!! Or our proverbial e 🪿is cooked for a very long time
Substack is gaining in popularity because it goes where mainstream media does not, cannot, will not go.
Not “cannot”. They are just afraid of a weak little man and are cowards - not necessarily the reporters, but the people with the money pulling the strings.
Are you keeping up with the election integrity issues in Rockland County New York? https://www.newsweek.com/judge-2024-election-lawsuit-timeline-2084468
I have a hard time imaging an NY precinct where Kamala got 0 votes. Judge says discovery can proceed; I think their next court date is in September, but Lulu says she hopes they (SMART Elections) can give a preliminary report around June 23rd. Not sure but they may get to look at the paper as part of the Discovery.